Peston's picks a must read
My new role which means I have had less and less time to blog and podcast has also limited the amount of online content I can digest.
Shooting up the tables of my must reads is Peston's picks written by the BBCs business editor. Yet again he cuts to the chase with his analysis of Browns latets wheeze of cutting stamp duty.
Now as someone who is selling a house that was originally on the market at £180k but now is under the £175k threshold the cut in stamp duty should be just what I have calling for.
But as Peston points out, it isn't stamp duty that's the problem - although I would urge the Chancellor to retain the £175,000 threshold permanently, the issue is that people can't get mortgages. With lenders unwilling to give people the funds to buy houses, the market is suffering a classic case of over supply and under demand, and as we all know, when that situation arises, prices fall.
Although I am keen to sell our house I think Robert Peston is also right when he calls into question whether government should have a role in encouraging people back to the market. If house prices are going to fall even more, then Government should have absolutely nothing to do with making it easier for people to buy, as they will only play their part in handing a nice piece of negative equity to thousands. Blair wanted his legacy... is this going to be Browns?





![[listen]](/files/images/nav_speaker.png)
![[podcast]](/files/images/nav_podcast.png)
![[contact]](/files/images/nav_mailinglist.png)



I agree, Robert Peston is certainly a man who offers real insight and great analysis of many business, economic and political issues.
With regard to house prices it has been clear for a number of years that a collapse was inevitable. I personally blame the banks; for years they have been lending more and more money to people with dubious financial stature without real regard to the application of sound financial analysis. A BBC money programme some years ago highlighted the issue of self certified mortgages, essentially loans to people without any checks on their ability to pay. The simple driving force behind this sort of behaviour was greed and the bonus system paid to many working in banking who meet sales targets. The whole system relied upon the continued rise in house prices, once that ceased the whole thing came tumbling down like a pack of cards.
It is ironic that the profits made by the banks in the good years were private profits whilst the losses that they are now making would appear to be public losses as the taxpayer is effectively bailing out the banking system.
It is clear that the banks cannot be trusted to behave prudently and I would like to see far more regulation and governance of their behaviour to ensure future balance sheets are far more sensible and prudent. Of course that will mean money will become harder to acquire and more expensive to borrow. On the positive side this of course will mean that products typically bought using loans will have to become more affordable, as houses and cars are becoming now.
Anybody struggling in the present climate has my sympathy but it pays to remember who your friends are. The banks have responded by increasing the profit margins on many of their products at the expense of the consumer. Can anybody justify arrangement fees for mortgages that now run into thousands of pounds? How exactly are the banks able to get away with this blatant exploitation?
Can only agree - he's revitalising how the BBC reports news in the world of business and finance. While an objective but detached voice is good for general news reporting, Robert's keen insight and strong personal voice mean I'm checking up his blog almost as much as the BBC's main business reports these days.
Post new comment